We have been talking in this blog about stocks, gold, silver and their
miners. However, we kept silent as to the US treasury bonds.
First of all, I must admit that bonds are not so easy to be analyzed
under Dow Theory. Dow Theory works best when applied to correlated markets
(i.e. SPY and Transports) but when correlation is too high (i.e. 10 Years Bond
and 30 years Bond) then, instead of having two similar, but different markets,
we end up having two almost “cloned” markets.
Thus, Dow Theory analysis of the US Treasury market should be made
indirectly, by applying Dow Theory to its ratios. In my opinion the two most
relevant ratios to be applied to the Treasuries are: BLV/GLD (the long term
Bond ETF versus Gold ETF) and the BLV/SPY. By looking at the ratio we can see
the patterns that develop and we can apply Dow Theory to them.
Furthermore, and independently from ratios, gold strength (i.e. its being
in a primary bull market) tends to spell trouble for bonds. Why? Because gold
is to the USD what kryptonite to Superman. The stronger gold, the weaker the
dollar and a weak dollar spells trouble for bonds too.
So, armed with the direct observation of gold, its relative strength and the
above mentioned ratios, we can derive a pretty accurate technical picture of
the long term treasuries.
And how is this picture?
Not very pretty.
First I will analyze the “negatives”:
A) Bearish aspects for Bonds.
First of all, we now that gold is in a primary bull market. Go to my post “August 22, 2012. Dow Theory signals a new primary bull movement in gold and silver?” which you can find here to learn more about the details and implications. In this post, it suffices to be said that a 50% price gain in the next 12-18 months would not be uncommon.
I can imagine a substantially lower USD if gold goes up by 50%. Such
weaker dollar would spell trouble for long term bonds.
Secondly, the BLV/SPY ratio turned bearish on 01/20/2012. This means
that since that date stocks were holding the upper hand. Look at the chart
below. You will see that the trend of the ratio, even for those still weak in
Dow Theory, is clearly down.
The ratio of long term bonds to stocks is bearish suggesting stocks hold the upper hand |
However, we know under Dow Theory that confirmation is necessary to derive valid conclusions. The confirmation I'm looking for, should come from the BLV/GLD ratio and hitherto this ratio has refused to confirm (more on this below).
B) Mildly bullish aspects for bonds.
What about the BLV/GLD chart?. Well, according to Dow Theory, and in
spite of a secondary correction in favor of gold currently under way, the ratio
is still bullish for BLV. If we look at the chart, we see that the ratio is
just about to violate the previous significant secondary reaction low. However,
this hasn’t happened yet. When this occurs, technically, almost all bets are
off.
However, the BLV/GOLD ratio refused to confirm the breakdown of bonds |
I said “almost” all bets are off, because technically, gold, in spite of
being in its own bull market, is still weaker than the SPY and SLV. Such
relative weakness of GLD give the USD, and consequently bonds, a respite. You
can find more details as to the implications of the relative weakness of gold
in my post: Is really gold glittering? Who benefited most from QE? which
you can find here
Finally, and although I shed more importance to my Dow Theory studies,
look at the trend lines in the charts. If the lower trend line is finally
broken, this is a further sign of real trouble for the bonds. But, as of this
writing this break has not occurred yet, but it is about to occur.
Conclusions:
1) the
USD is threatened by the primary bull market in gold.
2) This may
spell trouble for US Treasuries.
3) The
BLV/SPY ratio is bullish for stocks suggesting relative weakness of long dated
treasuries over stocks.
4) The
BLV/GLD is still bullish suggesting the GLD is still not ready to fully shine
or bonds ready to die.
5) GLD
is weaker than SLV and SPY further suggesting that the USD that Armageddon is
not yet with us.
Have a nice day.
Sincerely
The Dow Theorist.
No comments:
Post a Comment