Transports make higher closing high unconfirmed.
Recently, one comment on one
post of mine on Seeking Alpha raised the point of manipulation and how it can
affect the Dow Theory.
Here you have the question and my answer:
Sharpe_Spectator
Lets say the
fundamentals are messed up and a group of fund managers get together and dress
up the trades that triggers a technical signal which you are used to looking
out for, aren't you bothered?
Hi Sharpe_Spectator,
You raise a valid point. One of the
tenets of the Dow Theory is that the daily movements and even secondary trends
may be manipulated. Most technical signals belong in this shorter term
timeframe. However, the primary trend, like a powerful tide, cannot be
manipulated. This is why Dow Theorists invest along the primary trend (which
lasts on average 1-2 years) and dismiss the secondary trend for investment
purposes (to avoid the manipulation you are mentioning). Of course, this is not
a “dogma," and things may have changed, and maybe nowadays even the
primary trend might be subject to some influence by the Fed. Nevertheless, I’d
rather run this risk than blindly believing my own ego-filled fundamental
assumptions about the economy, the health of stocks, etc. Now it is often made
the point that the Fed is manipulating upwards stocks. I tend to believe it.
However, whatever the underlying reason, what I see (and if you follow my blog
you will see that I have been bullish amidst a sea of bearishness) is that the
primary trend is “up." Even if the Fed started to monetize all stocks (and
this would be manipulation) the fact would remain that stocks would be going
up. Here the time-tested adage “don’t fight the trend” comes in handy.
US Stocks
The SPY, and Industrials closed down.
The Transports closed up.
The primary trend was reconfirmed as
bullish on October 17th, 2013, and November 13th, 2013 and March
7th, 2014, for the reasons given here, here and here.
So the current primary bull market
signal has survived three secondary reactions.
Gold and Silver
SLV, and GLD closed down. For the
reasons I explained here, and more
recently here
the primary trend remains bearish.
For the primary trend to turn
bullish, SLV and GLD should jointly
break above the secondary (bullish) reaction highs. As a reminder, the
secondary reaction closing highs were made on August 27th, 2013.
From such highs the market declined without jointly violating the June 27th,
2013 primary bear market lows.
Here I analyzed
the primary bear market signal given on December 20, 2012. The primary trend
was reconfirmed bearish, as explained here. The
secondary trend is bullish (secondary reaction against the primary bearish
trend), as explained here.
On a statistical basis the primary
bear market for GLD and SLV is getting old. More than one year since the bear
market signal was flashed has elapsed. However, I am extremely skeptical as to
the predictive power of statistics. I prefer price action to guide me, and the
Dow Theory tells me that the primary trend remains bearish until reversed.
However, the secondary bullish reaction against such old primary bear market is
also getting quite old. Tie.
Furthermore, the June 27, 2013 lows
remain untouched. The longer this situation lasts, the higher the odds that
something might be changing. But I wait
for the verdict of price action.
As to the gold and silver miners ETFs, SIL closed and GDX closed down.
I profusely explained that SIL and
GDX set up for a primary bull market signal. You can find all the relevant
information from a Dow Theory standpoint here.
Please mind that a setup is not the
real thing. So the primary trend has not turned bullish yet
(or maybe “never”).
The secondary trend is bullish, as
explained here.
In spite of short term bullish accomplishments, SIL and GDX are not in a
primary bull market.
The primary trend for SIL and GDX
remains, nonetheless, bearish, as was profusely explained here
and here.
The secondary trend is bullish, as
explained here. In spite of short term bullish
accomplishments, SIL and GDX are not in a primary bull market.
The primary trend for SIL and GDX
remains, nonetheless, bearish, as was profusely explained here
and here.
General
note for both GLD/SLV and GDX/SIL:
Unless it is a “fake out”, the “coiling” seems to evolve into a breakdown for
the precious metals. If it is a “fake out” precious metals should snap back
into the range soon or else….
More about the “coiling” here
and here.
Sincerely,
The Dow Theorist
No comments:
Post a Comment