Trends for Gold and Silver, US stocks and US interest rates unchanged
Recent developments are contributing to further cementing my faith in trend following (when properly applied), and, in particular, the Dow Theory, and to remain impervious to many siren’s songs. I’ll give you one example.
Last February 26th, I was perusing an economy Spanish newspaper. You’ll remember that by February 26th US world indices had already been inflicted a good deal of pain. An article highlighted that after closing at 9281.3 and having declined ca. 10% from the market top, the Spanish IBEX 35 (Index that comprises the top 35 listed Spanish companies) was a good buy because it yielded ca. 4.5%. The rationale of the article was that the index was relatively “cheap” given the high dividend yield so it could be a good buy. Even I felt the tinkling of greed and thought that maybe, just maybe, the journalist could be right. However, temptation just lasted some seconds, as immediately the following thoughts came to my mind:
a) Don’t catch a falling knife (unless you have the time-tested capitulation, and even then do it piecemeal).
b) Trying to catch a good dividend yield may result in sizeable capital losses.
c) Dividend yield tends to be high for good reason: The market anticipates further declines and/or dividend cuts due to the looming recession.
d) Don’t touch dogs. I pains me to say that Spain is not US, not even Germany, and not even France. While I am no fundamentalist, I have eyes to see that Spain is besieged by problems and has fallen prey to a socio-communist government. Not the best political setting for enterprises and the market knows it (in spite of the Spanish sedated press)
Well as of this writing, the IBEX 35 has fallen ca. 40% and today, March 12th, itdeclined a whopping -14% by closing at 6444.90. So if I had bought the “good looking dividend yield” IBEX 35 last February 26th at 9281.3, I would have made a loss of -30.56%. So much for an attractive dividend yield!
Hence, even if the ongoing decline is annoying to us Dow Theorists, we should take solace in knowing that:
a) We follow US indices (other countries are suffering much more, as they are not so business oriented as US, and their economies lack the flexibility of US).
b) The losses that we may be temporarily undergoing under trend following will pale by comparison to those of buy and hold.
c) In such moments, it is good to take the long term view. The last 21 years for those following Schannep’s rules have been pretty good as there has been outperformance and greatly reduced drawdowns (both in time and depth). Please mind, I write “rules” instead of “Dow Theory”, as he also has the “timing” indicator which is another gem in Schannep's trading arsenal You’ll find a quite exhaustive study here.
Under Schannep’s Dow Theory
The primary trend is bearish since March 9th (penetration of the lows of the current secondary reaction) or even February 25th (alternative exit based on the penetration of the lows of the previously completed secondary reaction), as explained here.
Of course, the secondary trend is also bearish.
Under the Rhea/Classical Dow Theory
The primary and secondary trend turned bearish on March 9th (once again: the lows of the last completed secondary reaction violated) as explained here.
GOLD AND SILVER
The primary and secondary trend were signaled as bullish on 02/19/2020, as explained here.
In just four days SLV declined drastically and almost violated the last recorded primary bear market lows. GLD declined but on a much more muted basis. Hence, the decline does not meet the time requirement for a secondary reaction.
Yesterday, March 11th, SLV violated the lows of the last primary bear market. Rhea (page 77 of his book, Fraser Edition 1993) recognized as a valid exist point the closing lows of the last primary bear market (red horizontal lines on the charts below). GLD remains at a safe distance, and hence no primary bear market was signaled. More about the alternative entry and exit signals under the Dow Theory here.
Here you have an updated chart:
|The red horizontal lines highlight the lows of the last primary bear market|
GOLD AND SILVER MINERS ETFs
The primary trend was signaled as bearish on March 11th, 2020.
Following the turmoil which afflicted markets last week, SIL violated on 02/28/2020 the lows of the last completed secondary reaction, which also constitute a valid exit signal (especially
under the Classical Dow Theory), unconfirmed by GDX. On March 11th, 2020 GDX confirmed, and, thus, we got a primary bear market signal.
By the way, I’m beginning to making a habit not posting in the very same day when a new signal is given. As I wrote in my last post, this blog is about learning and perfecting our Dow Theory knowledge. It is not supposed to be a subscription service with trading alerts.
I don’t have much time left. It suffices to say that the current trade was a winner. The spreadsheet below shows the dates of entry and exit and their respective closing prices. As you can see, SIL, the weakest of the pack, made 0.63% whereas GDX made 19.35%. While I don’t necessarily advocate for splitting one’s funds 50/50 (as there might be better options to be explored in the future), if one had done so the average gain would have been 10%
As to the time duration, the now bereaved primary bull market has lasted almost 15 months, which is quite in line with an “average” bull market. Within this context, it is important to take the long term view. When I started this blog some 7 and odd years ago, I encountered some trades that lasted less than “average”. At the risk of too much reiterating, when trading long term with normally less than one trade per year, one must be patient before making assessments. We need a large enough sample. So some times we will get trades of short duration, others will be average, and occasionally we'll stumble upon +2 year trades. Once again, long term view, but the good one: the long term view of a trader that contains drawdowns. Not the blind long term view of buy and hold.
Here you have an updated chart which contains the last completed secondary reaction (left, orange rectangles) the subsequent rally and the final breakdown.
|The lows of the last completed secondary reaction (red horizontal lines) broken down. Primary bear market signaled|
Finally, here is a quite compressed chart showing all the market action comprising the primary bull market signal (left) and the recent primary bear market signal (right). As you can see the primary bull market "survived" one secondary reaction (the orange rectangles on the left side of the charts) while succumbed to the last one.
US INTEREST RATES
Depending on the way one appraises the secondary reaction that led to the setup that resulted in the primary bull market signal, the primary bull market was signalled either on 11/19/2018 or 12/18/2018. Rhea wrote that the definition of secondary reaction is not carved in stone. The signal of 11/19/2018 was obtained by being satisfied with just 14 trading days for TLT and 15 days for IEF. The signal of 12/18/2018 was obtained by being strict and demanding on a confirmed basis at least 15 trading days on both ETFs. It’s up to each investor to decide what to do (i.e. to commit to each signal 50% of one’s equity or go fully invested with just one signal).
On 11/08/2019 as secondary reaction was signaled, as explained here.
On 02/21/2020 TLT bettered its last recorded primary bull market highs of 08/28/2019. On that date IEF equalled (but did not better) its last recorded primary bull market highs of 09/04/2019, and hence there was no confirmation. On 02/24/2020 IEF did better its primary bull market highs and, therefore, we can declare the secondary reaction has ended, and the primary bull market as reconfirmed. From the reconfirmation date of 02/24/2020 TLT and IEF have gone almost parabolic reflecting the current chaos which is plaguing all markets.
However, I see a couple of small green shots (very small, to be truthful):
1. For the last three trading days, and in spite of US stocks making lower lows, TLT and IEF seem to be taking a pause, and have refused to make higher highs. This is good.
2. Capitulation: Although this remark belongs in the stocks section, we shouldn’t forget that capitulation tends to be near in time the bear market lows. Historically, capitulation has been 13.4 days away from the bear market bottom.
The behavior of US interest rates during these days of crisis reminds us that some bonds belong in many peoples portfolios provided they are under a bullish trend under the Dow Theory. Following Antonacci's idea contained in his excellent book "Dual Momentum Investing", for some investors a 60% stocks/40% bonds portofolio with a trend filter (when trend down go to cash) might be a sensible idea. Please mind that I wrote for "some" investors. Not all.
Here you have an updated chart:
One Dow Theorist