Trends unchanged.
US stocks:
The ranging
continues, and with it, trends have not changed. Thus, as per my reading of the
Dow Theory, the primary and secondary trend remains bullish. Here you can find
the latest in-depth explanation, which remains fully applicable to current
market conditions:
I say that the secondary
trend remains bullish, which is tantamount to saying that no secondary reaction
has been signaled yet. Here you find a deeper explanation as to the
non-existence of a secondary reaction, which is also a good primer on
appraising secondary reactions:
Chinese Stocks
Is headwind for
US Stocks coming? Chinese stocks are
undergoing a secondary (bearish) reaction against the primary bull market.
Please have a look at the chart below:
Orange rectangles on the right side of the charts highlight ongoing secondary reaction |
HAO made on two occasions
higher highs which were not confirmed by FXI (highlighted by blue ellipses). Such
a non-confirmation tends to be harbinger of a trend change of, at least, secondary
proportions.
FXI has
retreated -10.85% off its last recorded closing highs, whereas HAO has
retreated -9.27%. I have performed my volatility adjustments (i.e. 50 days
volatility comparison with the SPY) and without any doubt such a movement more
than exceeds minimum volatility thresholds (set by Rhea and Schannep at 3% for
US indices). Hence, the extent
requirement for a secondary reaction has been amply met. Even under a Rhea/Classical
Dow Theory viewpoint, the current decline has retraced more than 1/3 of the
last primary bull market swing (counted from the lows of the last completed secondary
reaction).
Furthermore, the
time requirement has also been amply
met, as it is evident from just a cursory look at the charts that both ETFs
have been declining for more than 8 trading days each.
From now on, we
have to look at a rally of ca. +3% (assuming volatility does not change much)
in at least one of the two ETFs. Once this rally occurs, Chinese stocks will
have completed a primary bear market set up. We are not there yet.
So, the primary
trend remains bullish, and the secondary trend is bearish (secondary reaction).
GOLD AND SILVER
The secondary trend turned bearish on February 6th,
2015 (secondary reaction against the primary trend) as explained here.
The setup for a primary bear market signal was
completed on March 24, 2015 as explained here.
Thus, now:
a) Either the primary bull market closing highs
01/22/2015 are bettered in which case the primary bull market will be
reconfirmed.
b) Or the secondary reaction lows are violated in
which case a primary bear market will be signaled.
We have to wait and see.
Gold and Silver
miners ETFs.
As to the gold and silver miners ETFs,on
3/10/15 SIL violated its 12/16/2014 primary bear market closing low. However,
GDX did not confirm. As per the Dow Theory lower lows
unconfirmed have no validity, and hence we cannot declare a primary bear
market. Since we cannot declare a primary bear market, the primary trend remains
bullish. Furthermore, the GDX and SIL staged a rally that set them up for a
primary bear market signal on March 24, 2015 as explained here.
Thus, now:
a) Either the primary bull market closing highs
01/20/2015 are bettered in which case the primary bull market will be
reconfirmed.
b) Or the secondary reaction lows (or the primary bear
market lows of SIL, and secondary reaction lows of GDX) are violated in which
case a primary bear market will be signaled.
Once again, we have to wait and see.
US DEBT
As to US debt, a primary bear market signal was
signaled on June 3rd, 2015. All price action from June 3rd remains
bearish, and hence both the primary and secondary trend for US debt remains
bearish.
Furthermore, the brand new primary bull market for the
EUR is no good omen for US debt. The primary and secondary trend for the EUR
(and CHF) remains bullish.
Here you have the details:
Sincerely,
The Dow Theorist
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI was wondering if you had CAGR and Max DD backtested information for your flavor of the Dow Theory for a meaningful expanse of time. I hesitate to ask because I imagine that this information is somewhere in this blog, but, I've not succeeded in unearthing it.
ReplyDeleteHere is the answer to your questions:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dowtheoryinvestment.com/2015/06/dow-theory-special-issue-maximum.html
Regards